Part 5 asks for a drawing that needs an extended time to be completed and/or engages temporal dimensions in an unusual form for the viewer.
My submission for this part is a small handling collection of 11 inkjet prints plus one text document (instruction) printed on A4 photocopier paper, each crushed into a small ball and assembled (in no particular order, other than the instruction page sitting in one of the corners) in a clear plastic storage box.
The instruction/ statement for the project reads as follows:
– is a handling collection from the stationery cupboard
– presents in a clear plastic box 11 inkjet prints on photocopier paper and one instruction (this one)
– the images are not presented in any order, they are however presented as crumpled, scrunched up balls of paper
– an instruction would be to unfold them, one by one
– other instructions exist
– is a handling collection for the stationery cupboard
– boxed up, the images chronicle a series of interventions in an office space
– boxed up, the images reorganise that space while maintaining its form
– boxed up, the images give evidence to the spatial order of the office
The titles is a play on the instruction ‘use me’, which is literal: handle me, unfold me, scrunch me up again; it is also metaphorical, as this project sits within the institutional space of work and overwork, it presents as previous submissions for this module as useable, made of ordinary materials found in an office; use me then can also read as submissive, libidinous instruction – m(e)use, reads as anagram, as muse, inspiration, and thus also seeks to transcend.
The timeline in this piece is a series of interventions within the office space (mainly a corridor, but also an individual office, a teaching lab) over the space of a year, twelve months. The timeline is also the time it takes to handle this submission: to take the paper balls out of the box, to unfold them. So, the viewing of the piece is made a bit difficult (if the images, the prints on each paper is considered the object). There is also, as in some of the previous work (Green, Hornet Tree) a question raised of engagement or not engagement: will a viewer become someone who handles, touches the object and thus activates it, or will they refrain from doing so (as in the loop and the delayed audio in earlier pieces, where viewers may simply exit).
This piece also presents a final testing ground for the parallel project. I will write more on this over the next couple of days.
A reflection of assessment criteria and a contextualisation of this work will also follow over the next few days.
I sent a copy of the piece to my tutor and below are some installation shots. My intent is to present the box to a few of my colleagues to test and experiment if it does indeed have some use value, but also as to what my role may be in working here and producing such work over such extended period of time.